Round Wood Project logo

Sustainable Systems Design, LLC

SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS DESIGN is an employee owned company. It began in 1996 when partners, Stuart Cowan, Ph.D. (co-author, Ecological Design, Island Press) and Katy Langstaff, M. Arch. had the dream of working in an interdisciplinary manner to create environments that restored both landscapes and people through design projects.  We advocate using The Natural Step as a compass for sustainability assessment, taking into consideration equality, ecology and economics in all of our endeavors. We love our work and look forward to the co-creation of a livable planet with you. In 2007, we launched our new business venture, Autopoiesis, LLC which expands our services. View Sustainable Systems Design, LLC projects at www.apoiesis.com.

Environmental Planning & Healthy Building Philosophy
SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS DESIGN is primarily concerned with making buildings and places which harmonize with the human spirit and their surroundings. Through designing with nature, we believe buildings can be integrated with the landscape and the biogeochemical cycles of the earth. Buildings can produce their own energy, harvest their own water, and treat their own wastes. They can use renewable, non-toxic, and regional materials. We strive to meet our client's needs and enjoy working in a participatory way.  Ultimately, we aim to produce buildings and places which are beautiful and which lead us towards a sustainable future.

The Process of Place Making and Making a Building
We believe that making a building or place should be enjoyable.  We recognize that this is a significant creation whose impact will be felt by many for a long time, that the time and effort involved is great, and that the process will require focused attention from the client and all of the individuals involved in making the building or place. One thing we believe is that in making a building or place it also makes us.  It shapes our lives and moves us deeply.  It affects us to the core, to our essence, and because of this impact we try to enhance the lives of the people involved in the process.  We believe that this will help us to create a living structure, one that is coherent and full of beauty.  We invite your participation.

Project Team:

Katy LangstaffKaty Langstaff, Principal, Sustainable Systems Design, LLC

Katy Langstaff, M.Arch.  is the project manager for the design and community facilitation for the Roundwood Utilization Project. She has experience leading communities through a participatory design process. Her design expertise focuses on natural building materials, hands-on locally produced building practices, healthy and non-toxic environments, harmonious spaces and ecological design.

Stuart CowanStuart Cowan, Principal, Sustainable Systems Design, LLC
Stuart Cowan, Ph. D. is an expert on bioregional economics and ecological design. He is coauthor of Ecological Design, Island Press, 2007 . Stuart was the Research Director at Ecotrust and developed the www.conservationeconomy.org,  an interactive website for NGO’s, business and government to identify a common pathway to a sustainable Pacific Northwest for both human and more-than human communities.
Stuart has helped to secure equity, debt, tax credit, and grant financing for sustainable buildings, ecological forestry, and other green sectors.

Michael MehaffyMichael Mehaffy, President, Structura Naturalis, Inc.
Michael Mehaffy is an internationally recognized expert in community planning, pattern languages and collaborative design.  He is president of Structura Naturalis Inc. in Portland, Oregon, and Research Associate with the Centre for Environmental Structure - Europe, which he co-founded with architect Christopher Alexander, author of A Pattern Language and The Nature of Order.  He is co-recipient of the Arthur Ross Award in Community Planning, for work on the Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina.

 


Overview
Sustainable Systems Design is excited to begin putting our ideas together for the following areas:

  1) the design of a community process;

  2) forest resource use opportunities for the building;

  3) principles and goals for ecological development of the building;

  4) planning and scheduling;

  5) potential economic development opportunities.


Planning Meetings & Tenative schedules

Elk Creek mists
Rainbow and mists above Elk Creek

March 6-7, 2007 Happy Camp Tour (working date)
Team members will hike, and drive in Happy Camp environs with community members to get to know the area. Visit Orleans and Yreka communities.

Friday, March 8, 2007 (working date):
First Community Workshop: Town Planning Workshop I
Working Title: “Weaving Knot Community Design Process”

Weaving is a tradition that has been practiced in the Klamath River basin for thousands of years. We hope to weave a complex ecological community and a diverse human community in a participatory process to improve the health of the human and ecological communities in and around Happy Camp, California.
(Note: workshop will be one day only; afternoon only attendance possible)

Summary:  We will conduct an initial design workshop for the area. We will identify ecologically significant features of  Happy Camp that will inform the subsequent design process.  Considerable time will be devoted to this, as the area (known as the Klamath Knot) is extremely complex.

A knot is an area of earth made up of extremely diverse minerals, terrain, weather and life forms such as trees, plants, insects and animals. Seven such knots exist in North America. Our home is in the heart of the Klamath Knot in Siskiyou County of far Northern California.  (From the Klamath Knot Arts Council)

There is a confluence of waterways in Happy Camp, California. The Klamath River and Indian Creek meet in Happy Camp. Biological diversity is enhanced at ecotones or meeting places such as this. Similarly, the residents of Happy Camp are diverse and varied. We will explore the opportunities for the residents of  Happy Camp and its environs to come together and express their ideas about the community space needs, spatial organization in terms of town layout and solicit input for the future development of the town of Happy Camp.

confluence – Klamath River and Indian Creek
1) The point or juncture of two or more streams. 2) A gathering flowing or meeting together; a joining.

weave – 1)  “weave something into” include an element in such a story or pattern. 2) to make basketwork by interlacing rods or flowers. 3) to make a complex story or pattern from a number of interconnected elements.

Objective: An invitation for the residents and community of Happy Camp to bring their gifts and visions to create new community centers. To determine a site or possible sites for the new Klamath Siskyou Arts Center [KSAC] building and other community development efforts. Presentation from the local groups that are seeking new facilities and their location/site needs, as well as, developers who are currently developing projects in Happy Camp. Topics might include: economic development; eco-tourism; “main street” concept, commerce center, educational areas, “town center”, places of interest for visitors; places of interest for residents; seasonal gathering places; protect ecological habitats, protect cultural resources, etc.

Method: Present the historic background and environmental assessment information for Happy Camp as a way to identify the possible site locations for the KSAC community center. SSD will present initial ideas about town planning and opportunities to place new development that will help the town grow in a holistic and a unified vision as the businesses and townspeople begin to create new structures.

[Note: This is a study in itself and a new scope of work for SSD. This information will assist the Happy Camp Collaborative and all residents for future planning efforts. This is an excellent opportunity to join efforts with the Ford Family Foundation and utilize additional funds for services available from the Technical Assistant Grant. Facilitators Roi Crouch and Mary Ward could assist with the small group Open Space facilitation.  SSD will employ Michael Mehaffy, Structura Naturalis, Inc. as part of this workshop and town planning effort.]

Outcome: Identify several possible sites that would suit the needs of the KSAC as well as other current building needs in Happy Camp, CA. Develop a feeling map or sensory map for use in subsequent design.  Identify committed community members to participate in the KSAC design and building process.  Document output in a written report.

Saturday, March 9 2007 (working date):
Workshop II: Pattern Language for the Klamath Siskiyou Arts Center
9:00a.m.  – 12:00p.m. or 1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.

Objective: We will define a vision of the Happy Camp Community art/science/culture center with community members who will use this facility.  We will identify the uses of this new center. This would include activities, seasonal uses, ceremonies, workshops, exhibit spaces, classes, etc. We will identify space requirements to support uses. We will provide a framework for the ecological design of the art center.

Presentation: SSD will present ecological design framework, including overview of ecological approaches to integrated building design of energy, water, waste, materials, etc.

Open Space Topics: local materials palette; activities for the arts building; qualities for desirable location; renewable energy; artists in residents; gallery space; educational workshop area; demonstration of sustainable systems; sustainable water and greywater systems; building as an educational experience of ecological design such as building with local materials and fostering local economies, and healthy building; role of KSAC in the community; extra rooms for lodging to experience first hand being in a clay building; micro-business enterprise for new building systems, etc.

Outcome: Initial building program including a “pattern language”.  Additional community participants identified for the entire process; eco-business opportunities highlighted that may arise in connection with the building. Goals established for the ecological design of the art center.

April 9-11, 2007 (Working Date):
Workshop III: Site Planning and Building Design
Present schematic design concepts
.

Objective: Get community feedback to initial designs. Stake-out building footprint on site. Locate and test window placement test views.
Method: Massing study 3-dimensional study, flow of movement and service of spaces in 2-dimensional study. Finalize materials palette.

Outcome: Refine the pattern language and spatial arrangement of the KSAC building. Establish its connection to the site. Character of the building emerges.

During Happy Camp Visit, interview local  engineers, general contractors and timber framers and make selections one for the next phase of the design process.  Identify design team members prior to Ecological Design Workshop IV.

June 25-28, 2007 (Working Date):
Workshop IV: Ecological Design

Refine site design and building design based on the input of technical ecological designers. This is the design development phase where building structure, materials and the character of the building emerges.

Objective: To identify ecological design opportunities and develop goals and strategies for a fully integrated whole building design, focusing on the building and site, but including the community in terms of economic development (resource management and material and system production) and social/cultural/spiritual integration. Identify financing and possible eco-business opportunities.

Method: Create a study model to test ecological design opportunities.

Outcome:  Ecological design goals and strategies; conceptual building and site design.

October 1-3, 2007 (Working Date):
Final Building Presentation

Construction techniques and building systems.

Objective: Present the building design which will be 25% of construction documents. Receive final input from the community about the Klamath Siskiyou Art Center.
Method: Make a detailed model or drawings which illustrate in detail the design decisions that are agreed to, including window sizes & sill heights, roof overhang, interior design.

Outcome:  Finalize all building and site decisions.

October – January 2008 (Working Date):
Construction Documents.

Coordinate ecological design consultant’s details for the permit drawings. Prepare final construction documents.

February 2008 (depending upon when the funding is in place):
Permit Submittal

General Outline of Construction Schedule (Leichtlehmbau Construction):

Once our team goals for ecological design are established we will have to include water, waste, energy and material strategies into this timeline. In regards to using and developing a local materials palette, we will have to include the harvesting and procurement of these materials in support of this construction timeline.

Site work (April 2008)

Foundation (April 2008)
The foundation must have a 3’ stem wall of impermeable material. This protects the leichtelehmbau walls.

Framing & Electrical & plumbing stub-out (May 2008)
Frame walls and floor deck. Stub in electrical, plumbing and mechanical as required for leichtlehmbau wall system.

Leichtlehmbau Walls (June 2008) roughly 2 weeks
Note: These must be installed in the dry season. At roughly 12” thick the woodchip and clay mix will need 1” per week to dry, or 12 weeks. This process does not impede the rest of the construction process.

Roof framing (mid-June 2008)
It is important to close-in the building. The roof design will have a 3’ overhang to protect the exterior walls from driving rain if they are made of lime or earth plaster. It is less necessary if they have a cladding of some kind.

Interior walls: if these will be made of leichtlehmbau, they will be approximately 4” thick and would need 4 weeks to dry. It might be better to build them before the roof is completely closed in, depending upon the building design.

Building completion (November 2008)
Plumbing, electrical, mechanical, flooring, trim, windows and doors, interior finishes, furniture and landscaping.


Research links:

            http://www.earthbuilding.info/index_gb.html

            http://www.earthbuilding.info/pdf/DVL_consumerinfo_gb.pdf

           http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/156686/0042109.pdf

           https://www03.cmhcschl.gc.ca/b2c/b2c/init.do?language=en&shop=Z01EN&areaID=0000000045&productID=00000000450000000007

           http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Space_Technology

Technical references:
Giving the Land a Voice: Mapping Our Home Places, Edited by Sheila Harrington, Environment Canada, revised edition 1999.
Regenerative Design for Sustainable Development, John Tillman Lyle, John Willy & Sons, Inc., 1994.
Building with Earth, P. Doat, et. al, The Mud Village Society, New Dehli, India, 1991.
Ecological Design, Sim Van der Ryn and Stuart Cowan, Island Press 1996.
The Ecology of Building Materials, Bjorn Berge, Elsevier Science, Ltd., 2000.
Guiding Principles of Sustainable Design, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1993.
The Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineered Material, Forest Products Society, 1999.
“Timber Frame Enclosure Options,” Steve Chappell, Joiners’ Quarterly: The Journal of Timber Framing & Traditional Building #38, Spring 2000, pages 37-40.
Appropriate Building Materials: a Catalogue of Potential Solutions, Roland Stulz, SKAT, 1988.
The Nature of Order, Christopher Alexander, Books 1-4, Center for Environmental Structure, 2003-2005.
A Pattern Language, Christopher Alexander, Oxford University Press, 1977.
Earth Construction Handbook: The Building Material Earth in Modern Architecture, Gernot Minke, WIT Press, 2000.


About Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2003 Company Name